Search for: "RN v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 7:18 am by Ron Miller
The court was unwilling to ignore a clear and deliberate policy choice by state legislators to provide more expansive coverage under state overtime laws than is available under the FLSA. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Freistein: The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Well, it would be better, as illustrated by the case L'Oréal v RN Ventures: exclusive licence registration and costs recovery. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 11:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying the hospital’s motion for summary judgment, a federal district court in Pennsylvania found that triable issues of fact existed as to the timing of the discharge decision as well as to whether the RN had been criticized for related performance issues prior to her request and taking of FMLA leave (Exter v Wilkes-Barre Hospital Co, September 3, 2014, Mariani, R). [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Sophie Corke
See coverage on FOSS Patents, JUVE Patent, Legal Patent, and the Kluwer Patent Blog - and, of course, the IPKat - for more.Over on Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter commented on the UK Supreme Court's recent "well-reasoned" decision in Secretary of State for Health v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:45 am
Joyner, The legal meaning and implications of Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Stuart Casey-Maslen, Armed non-state actors and 'nuclear terrorism' Louise Doswald-Beck, Human rights law and nuclear weapons Stuart Casey-Maslen, The right to a remedy and reparation for the use of nuclear weapons Gro Nystuen, Conclusions on the status of nuclear weapons under international law [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:42 am
Helfer & Mikael Rask Madsen, International Court Authority in Question: Introduction to Part III Andrei Marmor, Authority of International Courts: Scope, Power and Legitimacy Michael Zürn, International Courts: Command v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:15 am
This concept has been recognized by New York State's Court of Appeals in Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
This is the conclusion of the Düsseldorf based patent lawyer Ingve Björn Stjerna, who meticulously investigated the procedure leading to the German ratification of the UPCA. [read post]