Search for: "ROBERT T. CRAWFORD"
Results 21 - 40
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
It was a difficult decision, but I concluded I couldn't pass up the opportunity to broaden the focus of my reporting and tackle a wider variety of legal and political issues, including having a regular role on Face the Nation. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
Today’s wantonly authoritarian dissent in Redding is one of the single scariest things I’ve ever read in a Supreme Court opinion issued in my lifetime.Read: Barely agrees with Crawford at all.This was, after all, the essence of the position taken by his mentor William Rehnquist in his Crawford concurrence, and it is otherwise fairly consistent with Roberts’ brand of moderate conservatismIncluding not one, but two appendices full of [mostly… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
The article everyone’s talking about on John Roberts’s switch [Jan Crawford, CBS] But who were her sources? [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
I didn't press them on that, because I wasn't looking to persuade a clerk to violate the code. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
So far, however, we don’t have any clear evidence against the claim made in Crawford’s story, and at least some circumstantial evidence backing it up. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 5:23 am
Alito didn't know that he had been Miers's choice for the O'Connor vacancy after Roberts got the nod for the top spot. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Robert E. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
’” Example 2: “The fact that the joint dissent doesn’t mention Roberts’ majority was not a sign of sloppiness, the sources said, but instead was a signal the conservatives no longer wished to engage in debate with him. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 12:49 pm
” On her Legalities blog, ABC’s Supreme Court reporter Jan Crawford Greenburg has a lot to say on this. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
Thanks again to Jan Crawford Greenburg for participating. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
Jan Crawford reported yesterday that two Supreme Court insiders “with specific knowledge of the deliberations” behind last week’s monumental healthcare decision have revealed that Chief Justice Roberts originally voted to strike down President Obama’s health care reform law but switched his vote sometime after the initial conference. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:36 pm
Crawford noted that before Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito arrived at One First Street, there was an 11-year span during which the Court’s composition didn’t change. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:30 am
But Bush was looking for confirmable and congenial nominees, and he thought Roberts and Alito better fit the bill. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
I don’t believe partisan politics motivated Chief Justice Roberts in Citizens United and I think his concurrence, devoted to stare decisis, was his way of explaining why he reached the decision he did. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
As Crawford says, we don’t know why Roberts changed sides. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:18 pm
On the subject of Justice Scalia's age, here's an interesting squib from Jan Crawford Greenburg's most excellent new book, Supreme Conflict, describing how Justice Scalia edged out Judge Robert Bork as a SCOTUS nominee: [T]he politics of the nomination turned on age and compatibility. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:12 pm
After initially siding with the conservatives, Roberts tried to persuade his liberal and conservative colleagues to converge around a result that would avoid a sweeping 5–4 ruling along party lines, according to Crawford. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:49 am
The Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
For what its worth, I think if Roberts hadn’t made his first mistake, Obama certainly would not have misspoken when it was his turn. [read post]
