Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE" Results 1 - 20 of 1,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2022, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Sebelius, the Commerce Clause and Activity/Inactivity, SSRN (2021): There has been considerable disagreement among courts and legal commentators whether Chief Justice RobertsCommerce Clause discussion in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts said that the Commerce Clause does not give Congress the power to regulate economic inactivity. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:49 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
On March 29, the Second Circuit issued two Commerce Clause/Dormant Commerce Clause decisions: American Trucking Assoc., Inc., et al., v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
” The post Afternoon round-up: Oral argument in <em>Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:15 pm
On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:30 pm by Ted Frank
In a 5-3 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court rejected the Chamber of Commerce's position that federal law preempted Arizona's E-Verify requirements. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:02 am by Lawrence Solum
The doctrinal basis for RobertsCommerce Clause analysis was hotly contested. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:21 am by Dennis Crouch
productId=185913244 From the brochure: There have been many articles forecasting the fall of e-commerce patents after Alice Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 1:56 am
Here is the abstract:Forty years ago, in a dormant Commerce Clause dispute over dairy regulation, Justice Robert [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:05 am by Lawrence Solum
 First, Justice Roberts opinion on the Commerce Clause issue endorses the so-called new federalist understanding of the Congress's Article I powers. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 7:30 pm by Tom Smith
” This year’s term ended with the same man stating in Department of Commerce v. [read post]