Search for: "RODRIGUEZ V. DEPT. OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2011, 7:12 am
Dept. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
If tainted by suggestion, identification procedures can lead to irreparable misidentification (People v Rodriguez,79 NY2d at 449); “[t]he influence of improper suggestion upon identifying witnesses probably accounts for more miscarriages of justice than any other single factor; perhaps it is responsible for more such errors than all other factors combined”(People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d at 449). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:15 am
Budget Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 44 AD3d 216, 220, 841 N.Y.S.2d 486, 490 (1st Dept. 2007); Maione v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court New York County Justice Lyle E. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court New York County Justice Lyle E. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:39 am
Defendants failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that their withdrawal of the appeal was not negligence but a reasonable strategic decision (see Rodriguez v Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C., 81 AD3d 551 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Jenkins, 157 AD2d 854 (2nd Dept. 1990); see also, People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Supreme Court Justices continue to dismantle the Texas Whistleblower Act Comment on Office of the Attorney General v Ginger Weatherspoon, No. 14-0582 (Tex. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:21 am
Defendants failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that their withdrawal of the appeal was not negligence but a reasonable strategic decision (see Rodriguez v Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C., 81 AD3d 551 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 20, 118 S.Ct. 275, 139 L.Ed.2d 199 (1997); Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
OPINION Opinion by Justice DAVID EVANS. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Rodriguez, 109 A.D.3d 595, 599, 971 N.Y.S.2d 109 (2d Dept 2013) Justice Cooper reviewed the parties’ overall financial circumstances. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 204 (2nd Dept 2007). [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
The Court agrees (see Rodriguez v New York City Housing Authority, 304 AD2d 468, 469 [lst Dept 2003]), and also rejects Hand‘s affidavit as wholly inappropriate. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Edward Zelinsky maintains that in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
