Search for: "RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The Department of Water Resources (DWR) is the agency defending the action for the state, represented by the Attorney General. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
” Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
United States Department of Defense U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
These statutes may provide authority that overlaps the inherent authority of the President to conduct foreign relations of the United States under Article II of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Rodriguez, decided in 1985 and 1986. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Stuff prosecutors should like Manuel Antonio Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Coast Guard when the vessel is within the waters of the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Coast Guard when the vessel is within the waters of the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Department of Defense (October 11): Whether challenges to a 2015 rule that defines the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act should be filed first in federal district court or a federal court of appeals. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Kansas (No. 18-6135) Argument date 10/7: The question presented is whether the VIII and XIV Amendments permit states to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Department of Defense, Patchak v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
,” citing Utah v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) has likewise recognized the de minimis principle, codifying the defense at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
A foreign defendant who comes to the United States to raise a defense, is in essence imprisoned, though in a large prison, as soon as he steps foot in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” In Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
“Every action that I and my office have taken for the last 23 years that I have been privileged to be in the United States Congress has been based on pursuing the best policies for the people of New Jersey and this entire country. [read post]
