Search for: "ROEMER v. ROEMER"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 5:05 am
Neoshia Roemer published a robust summary of the upcoming Haaland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:42 am
Cohen's "Marxist Boxing Match: Roemer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 5:48 am
Neoshia Roemer has posted her work-in-progress, Equity for American Indian Families, on SSRN. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 3:52 am
Neoshia Roemer has posted “The Indian Child Welfare Act as Reproductive Justice,” forthcoming in the Boston University Law Review, on SSRN. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:45 am
In her forthcoming article, The Indian Child Welfare Act as Reproductive Justice, Professor Neoshia Roemer considers the impact of Dobbs alongside the potential gutting of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in Brackeen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:33 pm
BY JOHN ROEMER *** Just days after the Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:13 pm
Roemer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:25 pm
" Although counsel for the parties in the United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:29 am
Vacating a disciplinary arbitration awardRoemer v NYC Bd. of Ed., 268 AD2d 479, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 94 NY2d 763 The Roemer decision serves as a reminder that the grounds for appealing a Section 3020-a disciplinary determination are very limited. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
Roemer which held that communications showing a total breakdown of the attorney-client relationship marked the end of continuous representation, even though the order came days later. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
Republicans like Buddy Roemer have been harshly critical. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:21 am
By Eric Stern On July 19, 2018, the New York Appellate Division, Third Department, ruled in Roemer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:18 am
In a split decision, the North Carolina Court of Appeals (See Christie v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
All of the documentary evidence demonstrated that the relationship necessary to invoke the continuous representation doctrine terminated in August 2006, and the plaintiff's submissions did not indicate that her trust and confidence in the defendants continued, or was restored, after that date (see Rupolo v Fish, 87 AD3d 684; Krichmar v Scher, 82 AD3d at 1165; Marro v Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner, 1 AD3d 488; Piliero v Adler & Stavros, 282 AD2d 511,… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
