Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 7:39 am
I very much enjoy debunking those myths: United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nassif v Seven Network [2021] FCA 1286. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
”ICYMI: An illustrated history of vaccine mandates in the United States (Chicago Tribune). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:29 am
United States, — Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 3:08 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am
In the Courts The case of Apple v Epic has concluded with Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers granting a permanent injunction that said Apple will no longer be allowed to prohibit developers providing links or other communications that direct users away from in app purchasing. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 1:20 pm
Norton, District of South Carolina Roger T. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:41 am
United States Senators from both sides of the aisle have responded to the decision by stating their resolve to take action. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Again, I wasn't initially sold, but I watched the further developments with an open mind and less than a year later I think--in light of the recent announcement by three United States Senators--that the CAF may go down in history as one of the most impactful and important policy efforts in the history of the tech industry.The tide has turned. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:57 am
The number one issue that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers raised on the last day of the recent Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:06 am
At the time, then-OCR Director Roger Severino stated, “Providing patients with their health information not only lowers costs and leads to better health outcomes, it’s the law. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
United States: [The First] Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Douglass’s aggressively textualist anti-slavery reading of the Constitution is riveting when read just a few pages after Roger Taney’s extra-textual Dred Scott decision. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
