Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES" Results 361 - 380 of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
 The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:17 am by Anthony Lake
  As reported by ESPN (and virtually every other media outlet), United States District Judge Reggie Walton of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
The claims in context 4, even to the extent that they implicate fundamental rights to medical decision-making and informational privacy, should fail under United States Supreme Court precedents, including Whalen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:56 am by Wells Bennett
  Judges Rogers and Garland remain on the panel. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
By Holly Hayes Bovio One month ago, we started our health care conflict resolution series (see Part I,  Part II, Part III, and Part IV) focusing on the Roger Fisher, William Ury Getting to YES principled negotiation method involving: 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:26 am by gstasiewicz
The Obama administration has proven itself to be one of the most secretive administrations in history,” stated Pajamas Media CEO Roger L. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:44 am by Stephen Pitel
This is particularly so after the United States largely relinquished this role last year in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by Florian Mueller
A few hours after I wrote that this Friday (October 9) and Monday (October 12) were the days on which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California was particularly likely to rule on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction (PI)against Apple, and consistent with what I had told a major newspaper after Epic's temporary restraining order (TRO; blog post), Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has effectively converted the TRO into a PI… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:34 am by Roger Alford
It is, of course, a significant issue of international comity for a court in the United States to enjoin parties with respect to their litigation conduct in other jurisdictions. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
“To our knowledge, this is the first time a CPLR 906 class has ever been certified," said Newman Ferrara partner Roger A. [read post]