Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 10:12 am
The associations alleged that fully paid retiree health insurance was a vested benefit protected by the Contracts Clause of the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
The short also alludes to other, famous artistic legal battles, including the fair use case of Rogers v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:10 pm
**Re-Hashing the Hash Tag - Crowd Competition and Community Standards at the AALL2009 Conference [www.llrx.com] Roger V. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm
by Roger Alford The transcript for the oral argument in Abbott v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
In some ways this case is reminiscent of another case where a company’s branding consultant pushed the envelope (Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Rogers,281 U.S. 362, 369 (50 SC 299, 74 LE 904) (1930). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:38 am
Rogers, United States Supreme Court, March 28, 2011 [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:08 pm
Recently, Judge Roger Vinson of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ruled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA,” known by its opponents as “Obamacare,” but arguably much more appropriately named “Americare”) unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
Terry Rogers and Clark C. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Barcelo III, Substantive and Procedural Arbitrability in Ad Hoc Investor-State Arbitration — BG Group v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:25 pm
Spain, 209 F.3d 713, 715-16 (8th Cir.2000) (adopting continuing seizure approach); United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
United States" is now up on SSRN. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
