Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS" Results 1 - 20 of 2,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2007, 6:11 pm
A Houston trial court had ordered the embryos turned over to Augusta Roman, [...] [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am by Kelly Buchanan
Supreme Court made reference to Roman law: Columbian Insurance Company of Alexandria v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:19 am
On October 12, 2007, the Texas Supreme Court denied a request by Augusta Roman to reconsider  the Court’s  decision  in the  case of Roman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:22 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Julien Mailland (Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Telecommunications) has posted Roman Polanski and the 'Artists' Minister': American Criminal Law v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:27 am by sally
MAGA v Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256; [2010] WLR (D) 76 “An archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church was vicariously liable for the sexual abuse of a non-Catholic boy by a priest with special responsibility for youth work on the basis that there was a sufficient connection between the work he was employed to do and the abuse perpetrated. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:01 pm by pfriedman
I am convinced that, as Robbins puts it, “[v]isual effects . . . are as critical an element of persuasion as proper grammar and adherence to the rules of court and citation form. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:03 am by sally
MAGA v Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church Court of Appeal “There was a sufficient connection between what a priest with special responsibility for youth work was employed to do and his sexual abuse of a non-Catholic boy whom he met during that work, for his employer, an archdiocese of the Catholic Church, to be vicariously liable for that abuse. [read post]