Search for: "ROSS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 121 - 140
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 3:40 pm
It's a federal habeas death penalty case.The murder occurred in 1982 -- forty years ago.The California Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence in 1995, and the federal habeas petition was filed in 1996. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm
Ross, Cruz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:19 pm
Ross could have implications far beyond bacon prices in California.] [read post]
Justices add three new cases, including challenge to animal-welfare law and Warhol copyright dispute
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
In its 2020 decision Tanzin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
Ross presents a question of voting rights in special regulatory elections. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 10:09 am
(See, e.g., Ross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
Ross (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 153, 161 (Rubin).) [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
In 1957, in Lambert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Ross, 21-468, is the first one since 2014 (the foie gras case) that I can recall being relisted. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
Ross. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
This week, we filed our reply brief in Mohamud v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
(We recently marked the 50th anniversary of Younger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:06 pm
But we decline his invitation to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The Supreme Court hasn't overruled Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Officers: California law doesn't allow damages for loss of life. [read post]