Search for: "RR v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the “bedroom… [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:00 am by Todd Janzen
The United States Supreme Court has held that an Indiana farmer cannot plant Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans purchased from a grain elevator (or "commodity soybeans") without violating Monsanto's RR patent. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:39 am
With a small number of important exceptions to which I'll return in a moment, ever since Erie RR v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by christopher
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
 Form CRS also requires the BD to state that it has “a legal or disciplinary history” if either the BD or any of its RRs has made disclosures concerning criminal proceedings, regulatory proceedings, judicial proceedings, or unsatisfied judgments on their Forms BD, U-4 or U-5, or if an RR has reported a customer complaint or a specified termination on a Form U-4 or Form U-5. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm by Giles Peaker
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 52 The question of the powers of the First Tier and Upper Tribunals (and indeed initial decision makers) to disapply secondary legislation where there is a breach of the appellant’s human rights has reached the Supreme Court. [read post]