Search for: "RULE REGARDING ATTORNEY S FEES" Results 1 - 20 of 6,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 10:00 pm
Look to the Plain Text – The plain text of § 145 does not overcome the American Rules presumption against fee shifting. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:46 am by Rosengren Kohlmeyer, Law Office
Recovering Attorney Fees in a Minnesota Divorce For a variety of reasons, most states in America follow what is called the American Rule regarding the payment of each party’s attorney fees in litigation:  Which means each party must pay their own attorney fees. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 6:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
The general rule in most United States based lawsuits is that all parties pay their own attorney's fees, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm by Ron Ryan
 276044, the magistrate found that plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to an attorney fee (30%) under MCL 418.315(1) with regard to the unpaid medical bills. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am by bklemm@foley.com
The post CFPB Announces Proposed Rule Regarding Nonsufficient Funds Fees appeared first on Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:17 am by Anthony Carbone, PC
In that regard, it’s essential to understand how New Jersey law works when it comes to attorneysfees for accident claims. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
  This progression is consistent with the migration of other Supreme Court rules from one intellectual property field into another; for example, the application of the patent doctrine of willful blindness in copyright cases,[28] and the extension of eBay’s[29] rule regarding irreparable harm in patent permanent injunction applications to preliminary injunctions in both trademark and copyright cases.[30] Although trademark litigants should not expect… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
  This progression is consistent with the migration of other Supreme Court rules from one intellectual property field into another; for example, the application of the patent doctrine of willful blindness in copyright cases,[28] and the extension of eBay’s[29] rule regarding irreparable harm in patent permanent injunction applications to preliminary injunctions in both trademark and copyright cases.[30] Although trademark litigants should not expect… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 12:40 pm by Ian Richardson
The general rule in North Carolina is that each party is responsible for its own attorneys fees, unless the contract or a statute provides otherwise. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am by Howard Wasserman
But the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits held that some (and in the Eleventh, all) claims for contractual attorneys fees fall outside Budinich’s rule. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 6:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:38 pm by Eileen McDermott
Almirall regarding attorneys fees with respect to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings, though it did not reach that issue in the present case. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 11:35 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
THE AMERICAN RULE GOVERNS RECOVERABILITY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN LITIGATION Texas follows the American Rule, meaning that attorneys fees can only be awarded as part of the judgment if a contract or statute provides for them Whether a party may recover reasonable attorney's fees is a question of law for the trial court which we review de novo. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
Brinkema recently faced that question and ruled that the percentage-based attorneys-fee provision was unenforceable as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:31 am by David M. Goldman
Florida’s Fourth District recently ruled last week that Florida Legislature’s has the ability to cap attorneys fees and costs for bills that awards a plaintiff damages over the usual $200,000 cap when the state is a defendant in a tort action. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:13 am
" It is well settled that an attorney's noncompliance with the Rule generally precludes the attorney's recovery of fees in domestic relations matters (see Ackerman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:44 pm
In Malonis, the Court held that an attorney handling a case on contingency and who had been discharged was entitled to be paid under a quantum meruit theory and that his fee ought to come from the successor counsel’s contingent fee, not the plaintiff’s recovery. [read post]