Search for: "RULE REGARDING ATTORNEY S FEES"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2019, 10:00 pm
Look to the Plain Text – The plain text of § 145 does not overcome the American Rule’s presumption against fee shifting. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
Recovering Attorney Fees in a Minnesota Divorce For a variety of reasons, most states in America follow what is called the American Rule regarding the payment of each party’s attorney fees in litigation: Which means each party must pay their own attorney fees. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 6:22 am
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
The general rule in most United States based lawsuits is that all parties pay their own attorney's fees, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:09 am
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
276044, the magistrate found that plaintiff’s counsel was entitled to an attorney fee (30%) under MCL 418.315(1) with regard to the unpaid medical bills. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
The post CFPB Announces Proposed Rule Regarding Nonsufficient Funds Fees appeared first on Foley & Lardner LLP. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:17 am
In that regard, it’s essential to understand how New Jersey law works when it comes to attorneys’ fees for accident claims. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
This progression is consistent with the migration of other Supreme Court rules from one intellectual property field into another; for example, the application of the patent doctrine of willful blindness in copyright cases,[28] and the extension of eBay’s[29] rule regarding irreparable harm in patent permanent injunction applications to preliminary injunctions in both trademark and copyright cases.[30] Although trademark litigants should not expect… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
This progression is consistent with the migration of other Supreme Court rules from one intellectual property field into another; for example, the application of the patent doctrine of willful blindness in copyright cases,[28] and the extension of eBay’s[29] rule regarding irreparable harm in patent permanent injunction applications to preliminary injunctions in both trademark and copyright cases.[30] Although trademark litigants should not expect… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 12:40 pm
The general rule in North Carolina is that each party is responsible for its own attorney’s fees, unless the contract or a statute provides otherwise. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
But the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits held that some (and in the Eleventh, all) claims for contractual attorney’s fees fall outside Budinich’s rule. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 6:43 am
This case will be discussed in three blogs with each blog discussing the Courts ruling regarding attorney fees in insurance cases. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Some general issues regarding contractual attorney’s fees are discussed below. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:38 pm
Almirall regarding attorney’s fees with respect to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings, though it did not reach that issue in the present case. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 11:35 pm
THE AMERICAN RULE GOVERNS RECOVERABILITY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN LITIGATION Texas follows the American Rule, meaning that attorney’s fees can only be awarded as part of the judgment if a contract or statute provides for them Whether a party may recover reasonable attorney's fees is a question of law for the trial court which we review de novo. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
Brinkema recently faced that question and ruled that the percentage-based attorneys-fee provision was unenforceable as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
Florida’s Fourth District recently ruled last week that Florida Legislature’s has the ability to cap attorney’s fees and costs for bills that awards a plaintiff damages over the usual $200,000 cap when the state is a defendant in a tort action. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:13 am
" It is well settled that an attorney's noncompliance with the Rule generally precludes the attorney's recovery of fees in domestic relations matters (see Ackerman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:44 pm
In Malonis, the Court held that an attorney handling a case on contingency and who had been discharged was entitled to be paid under a quantum meruit theory and that his fee ought to come from the successor counsel’s contingent fee, not the plaintiff’s recovery. [read post]
