Search for: "RULE v BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 4:31 am
In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:05 am
In a potentially significant ruling, in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 11:00 am
BNSF Railway Company dba Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:50 am
In In re Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., __ F.3d __, 2010 WL 1980172 (7th Cir. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
This began a ten-year legal journey that culminated on June 22, 2006 when the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in her favor in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
This began a ten-year legal journey that culminated on June 22, 2006 when the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in her favor in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals are encountering and deciding CERCLA (or Superfund) "Arranger Liability" cases in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2009 decision in the case of Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:11 am
Furthermore, what specific policy goal does the Richardson rule promote? [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
In re Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Corp. [read post]
Supreme Court to Again Consider the Interplay Between a CERCLA Cost Recovery and Contribution Action
2 Apr 2021, 6:24 am
In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:59 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company arrives at a similar result. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 765 F.3d 765 (7th Cir. 2014). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm
Macfarlane (UW Law class of 1922) spent several decades as counsel to the Northern Pacific Railway and its successor company, Burlington Northern. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railway, et al., 2008 WL 2941359 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
Although the Fifth Circuit delineated an opposing view in Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm
A Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) train moves through Cajon Pass near San Bernardino, Calif., in 2009. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 am
Finding no clear error in a magistrate judge’s ruling that it would exceed the scope of Rule 34 to require a railway company to allow the EEOC and an intervening plaintiff to record, onsite, the performance of all essential functions of a job for which the plaintiff was rejected due to a hand impairment and to question current employees performing such tasks in “roving depositions,” a federal district court in Kansas denied a motion to review the… [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:48 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 941 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2019) and EEOC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Louisiana (07-1529), Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:23 pm
See Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
