Search for: "Raab v State" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Her solicitor stated that a witness statement which had been served on the Claimant should not be disclosed to the Defendant, as it was covered by the Agreement. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:05 am
State out of state DWAI offenses were sufficiently similar such that they could be used as prior convictions for enhanced sentencing.Petion, 33 FLW 2505, 2nd DCA, consent to search vehicle. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:00 pm
  The hip-replacement plaintiff in Raab v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:33 am
v so you still have time , just, to get in words of wisdom.The Enquiry is being assisted , I am glad to see, by my former colleague and learned privacy expert, Charles Raab at Edinburgh. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Raab responded to the demands by saying, “This issue is of the utmost importance and is being given urgent consideration. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
  And when you have both unique facts and split authority – you get decisions like Raab v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Milton Keynes Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 1575 (16 December 2011) Terluk v Berezovsky [2011] EWCA Civ 1534 (15 December 2011) Banks v Morgan & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1568 (15 December 2011) Liberty Insurance PTE Ltd & Anor v Argo Systems FZE [2011] EWCA Civ 1572 (15 December 2011) Titshall v Qwerty Travel Ltd [2011]… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
The Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab claimed that this sets out a series of measures to prevent so-called SLAPPs. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Ryan
Circuit’s decision in CREW v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:36 pm
As the Court of Appeals held in Delaraba v Nassau County Police Department, 83 N.Y.2d 367, “[i]t is well established law that random drug screening constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Federal and State constitutions (National Treasury Employees Union v Von Raab, 489 US 656; Matter of Caruso v Ward, 72 NY2d 432). [read post]