Search for: "Rafferty v Rafferty"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 7:20 am
And in Luna Torres v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
GoogleOn Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:33 am
Rafferty is representing the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:54 am
E, Rafferty Dep.) [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal Elias, Rafferty and Beatson LJJ held that an application not validly made in accordance with the Immigration Rules failed to engage s 3C. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
Western Delta Lands, 2003 BCCA 180; Rafferty v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Rafferty, 17 AD3d 888, 889 [2005]). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
In the case of Allen v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:40 pm
From People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
There was also a Norwich Pharmacal application in the case of Braben v Google Inc before HHJ Parkes QC. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) heard the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk over three days, 1, 2 and 3 November 2011. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Makudi v Triesman, 28 November 2013 (Laws, Tomlinson and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Makudi v Triesman, 28 November 2013 (Laws, Tomlinson and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Rafferty LJ granted the defendant permission to appeal. [read post]
