Search for: "Rafferty v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
The Hardwick class consists of every individual in the state of Ohio with measurable concentrations of certain PFAS chemicals. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm
In 2017, he served as co-lead counsel in Vigneron v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
Levin Papantonio Rafferty (LPR) attorneys fighting to hold social media companies accountable for recommending harmful content or supporting acts of international terrorism by hosting terrorist content filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm
Tisi is a shareholder with Levin Papantonio Rafferty. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 2:06 pm
Claimant State of Florida, 768 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1985); Bunge Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:01 am
(Middlesex Water Company v. 3M Company Case No. 2:18-cv-15366).U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm
Tisi is a shareholder with Levin Papantonio Rafferty. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
Lawyers for the Plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief for the class members, which would implement measures to prevent the dissemination of CSAM and other harmful content on the website.Levin Papantonio Rafferty Attorney Kim Adams stated in an LPR press release that she and co-counsel were “encouraged by the Court’s order. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:40 pm
From People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:45 am
In Rafferty v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Nov. 13, 2019) and Rafferty v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:39 am
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals (which hears appeals from the federal district courts in New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania and the United States Virgin Islands) recently had the opportunity to address the state of New Jersey employment law on restrictive covenants in the case of ADP, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:49 am
Applying the state’s three-factor analysis, the court found that ADP’s agreements will pass muster once the district court, on remand, strikes any offending provisions (Rafferty v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:33 am
Additional Resources: Rafferty v. [read post]
