Search for: "Rahim v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
In Rahim v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
The fate of the case, Al Janko v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm
As the Chief Judge of the Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, I have detailed myself as the Military Judge in United States v Abd al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Abdu Al-Nashiri. 2. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
The United States today appealed an adverse ruling in the capital military commission case against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:20 am
Your correspondent returns to the Fort Meade CCTV outpost, to take in almost-live broadcasts of the day’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:56 am
From its opening: Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri is a noncitizen “enemy combatant” undergoing proceedings before a military commission at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:41 pm
Abd Al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al Nashiri stands charged with serious violations of the law of war for his alleged role in attacking the United States warship USS Cole and the French vessel MV Limburg and in attempting to attack the United States warship USS The Sullivans. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Last week at the Guantanamo military commissions, proceedings resumed in the case of alleged USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm
Although the precise start date remains the subject of litigation—see United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:10 am
Lawfare returns to Fort Meade’s storied CCTV outpost, this time for arraignment in the Guantanamo military commission case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Circuit in Al-Janko v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
On April 18, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 does not authorize lawsuits against entities such as corporations, states, or political groups. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:32 am
Romania and Al Nashiri v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:18 pm
The digital privacy case is called United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:22 pm
As this Court held in Al-Zahrani v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:33 pm
Justice Thomas, however, argued in dissent that this conflict began as early as 1996 when Osama bin Laden issued his fatwa against the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
Al-Bihani v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
