Search for: "Railroad Company v. Commissioners" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 11:06 am by Casey Lide
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 339 U.S. 583 (1950). [4] Id., at 591; see, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
CIR    Commissioner of Internal RevenueSUTTON, Circuit Judge. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The plaintiff in Hartney resells fuel oil to railroads, trucking companies, gas stations and other fuel distributors. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
Exceptions to this provision include railroad and railway express companies and employees, certain casual employees, Federal employees in South Carolina, businesses with fewer than four employees, and agricultural employees. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Docket: 09-1255Issue(s): Whether the federally funded addition of a component of a warning device (retroreflective tape) to an existing warning device (a crossbuck warning sign) at a railroad crossing is the installation of a “warning device” under 23 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
Accordingly the Court affirmed the Commissioner's decision to deny Petitioner's benefits. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Railroads became the pioneers in this area, and their efforts to report and control costs, and to measure production and operating ratios, were major catalysts in the development of the accounting profession in the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
The jury in a condemnation proceeding was not bound by strict rules of evidence or normal civil trial procedures. 9 6  Const 1850, art 18, § 2 stated: When private property is taken for the use or benefit of the public, the necessity for using such property, and the just compensation to be made therefor, except when to be made by the state, shall be ascertained by a jury of twelve freeholders, residing in the vicinity of such property, or by not less than three commissioners,… [read post]