Search for: "Railroad Company v. Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Jim Dempsey
They were bolstered in that position by the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:53 am by Thomas B. Griffith
FRA, unions petitioned for review of the Federal Railroad Administration’s Final Rule revising regulations governing freight railroad safety. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
PAGA departs from that norm by granting the power to enforce a subset of California public law to every employee in the State. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Barry Winograd
Granted, some of the uncertainty in the opinion is drawn from its references to passages in Circuit City. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
Evidently, the petitioner in Mallory (a railroad worker who wants to sue his employer in Pennsylvania) was successful in arguing that his case is a better vehicle for addressing the issue than Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]