Search for: "Railroad Company v. Grant" Results 101 - 120 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In this instance, America Premiere Underwriters, Inc. and New York & Harlem Railroad Company established as "out-of-possession" landlords they had no such duty. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:31 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
Before its issuance, other companies developed generic versions of AndroGel. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
The railroad company was not properly served through an in-state agent, and sought relief from default under CR 60(b). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
Cities could not directly challenge gas-rate increases under the GRIP statute Atmos Energy Corporation, Centerpoint Energy Resources Corporation, and Texas Gas Service Company v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am by Sean Wajert
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, 501 A.2d 277, 278-79 (Pa. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether the government retains an interest in a right of way granted from public lands to railroads, which then abandoned the easement. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:10 am by John McFarland
” The case caused a stir among pipeline companies and their counsel, and resulted in new regulations at the Texas Railroad Commission, which approves intrastate pipeline projects, and efforts to bolster pipeline eminent domain authority by legislation. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:10 am by John McFarland
The case is Railroad Commission of Texas and Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 11:04 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation et al v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
The Solicitor General recommended that cert. be granted in only one of these eleven cases, B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]