Search for: "Railroad Company v. Manufacturing Company" Results 21 - 40 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm
LLC., No. 20-1681 (Amended Sept. 26, 2022), who deliver baked goods to stores and restaurants in Connecticut, brought a putative class action against the company and its subsidiaries that manufacture the goods they deliver. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:20 am
MacPherson (rejecting privity defense to find car manufacturer liable for negligence to consumer who bought the car from a retailer). 4. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no clear error in a magistrate judge’s ruling that it would exceed the scope of Rule 34 to require a railway company to allow the EEOC and an intervening plaintiff to record, onsite, the performance of all essential functions of a job for which the plaintiff was rejected due to a hand impairment and to question current employees performing such tasks in “roving depositions,” a federal district court in Kansas denied a motion to review the magistrate’s order… [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:50 am by Anthony Fazzio
The rule discourages medical device manufactures and pharmaceutical companies from updating warning labels with hazard information without prior FDA approval, a blatant attempt to influence the Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
We are unwilling to make brand manufacturers the de facto insurers for competing generic manufacturers. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm by Amy Howe
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by William A. Ruskin
In 2005,  Corson was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, after which Corson sued several dozen manufacturers, including  part suppliers of the railroad company's locomotives. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Times (3/9) Jim Copland, director of the Center for Legal Policy and Paul Howard, director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, write, "Pharmaceutical manufacturers in America now face a...hazardous path...after the Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed for the Washington Times (3/9) Jim Copland, director of the Center for Legal Policy and Paul Howard, director of the Center for Medical Progress at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, write, "Pharmaceutical manufacturers in America now face a...hazardous path...after the Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
  The federal law says that states cannot tax rail carriers in a discriminatory way; Alabama’s tax on diesel fuel applies only to railroads and not other transportation companies that are the railroads’ main competitors. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
For example, if a food-labeling law induces a food manufacturer to modify the amount of saturated fat or sugar in its product, the product change did not affect the manufacturer’s freedom of speech. [read post]