Search for: "Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2010, 4:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In the meantime, United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 ("Local 8") had been negotiating with Ralphs to make Foods Co a union store, but those negotiations had stalled. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:55 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The issue in this case arose out of labor picketing at a Foods Co. grocery store by non-employee representatives of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (“UFCW”). [read post]
30 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Mary Dwyer
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 12-1162Issue: Whether California’s Moscone Act, Cal. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:17 am by Marissa Miller
UPI’s Michael Kirkland previews Ralphs Grocery Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:18 pm by Brad Pauley
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8, S191251 —Review Granted and held pending decision in lead case, Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm by David Ettinger
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8:  (1) Did the Court of Appeal err in concluding that the parking area and walkway in front of the entrance to plaintiff’s retail store, which is part of a larger shopping center, do not constitute a public forum under Robins v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8 (Cal. 2012), the California Supreme Court upheld a content-based law that allowed union picketing but not other picketing on employers' private property. [read post]