Search for: "Ramirez v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Ramirez and Jones appeared first on Innocence Project. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
Ramirez and Jones appeared first on Innocence Project. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Presiding Justice Ramirez’s opinion does not explain why he is declining to follow Jones; the opinion does not even acknowledge that he is doing so. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 7:37 am
Ramirez and Jones will have a devastating impact on thousands of innocent people. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:40 am
The question in Shinn v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm
Ramirez and Jones is: If Martinez allows the prisoner to raise the claim, does AEDPA nevertheless prohibit her from developing evidence to support it? [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:56 pm
ShareIn Shinn v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:58 pm
The plaintiff in the recent case of Ramirez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:13 am
In Ramirez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999). [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:32 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Ramirez, the Supreme Court increased the chances that still more innocent people will be executed. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
That conundrum last reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in Martinez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Ramirez, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Ileana Ramirez, and El Milagro Minerals, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:39 am
Ramirez. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Jones, First Circuit: Appellant was sentenced to two life sentences, as well as various other 10-to-40 year sentences, related to child pornography and child sex act charges. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
For instance last week, Alito authored the majority opinion in Davis v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
Jones, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-483 (the proper standard to determine whether probable cause exists to issue a search warrant is the totality of the circumstances.) [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
