Search for: "Ramsay v. Ramsay"
Results 21 - 40
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
Ramsay via Twitter [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:35 am
Ramsay v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
” In Seibel v Ramsay (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 01617 [1st Dept Mar. 21, 2024]), the Court considered the propriety of a $4 million post-trial attorneys’ fee award to celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay under a contractual indemnification provision. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:36 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
Ramsay via Twitter [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
WT Ramsay v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1981): Ancient Values, Modern ProblemsJohn Snape11. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am
The daughter who only found out recently about her father’s ‘second’ family is married to the chef and businessman Gordon Ramsay, and the claimant was until recently associated with Gordon Ramsay in business. [read post]
6 Jul 2006, 8:38 am
See 1387881 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:55 am
The Supreme Court HMRC appealed to the Supreme Court, still advocating for the adoption of a broader Ramsay approach. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ritz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2006, 2:15 pm
I just noticed the text promos that CityTV is running for it during other shows, succintly describing it as: "Gordon Ramsay makes chefs cry. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 10:05 am
Ramsay via Twitter [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:17 am
Ramsay via Twitter [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
Orwig, Lee Anderson, Andrea Ryan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Baker, Stephen Johnson, Dennis Price, John Bartolomei, Luis Jones, Robert Price, Tom Bartscher, Joy Kaess, Ryan Rainville, Peter … [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of In re: GR Burgr, LLC; GR US Licensing, LP v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 1:45 am
The appellant local councils claim that they are entitled to the unpaid business rates from the respondents, either because the lease to the SPV was ineffective to make the SPV the ‘owner’ of the unoccupied property under the 1988 Act, applying WT Ramsay Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1982] AC 300 (Ramsay) (the statutory interpretation ground), or because the SPV should be ignored, relying on Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013]… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am
” Court Denies Summary Judgment Concerning Disputed 10% Membership Interest in Brooklyn Restaurant Galarza v Galarza, 2020 NY Slip Op 33801(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 6, 2020]. [read post]
