Search for: "Rand v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2008, 8:44 am
-Dental Bldg., 113 AD2d 276 [1985]; JMJ Contract Mgt. v Ingersoll-Rand Co., 100 AD2d 291, 293 [1984]). [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:41 am
See also State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
[OL; OC Register; Ogilvie v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:05 am
Rand v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. or Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:00 pm
In the wake of ACLU v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
The case cite is Rearden LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 pm
" *** The quip refers to the Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
” The State of the Union captured the state of our politics and it is not good. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:05 pm
State. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:44 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:08 am
As Lévêque and Ménière point out-- “the mainstream view is that the rationale for [F]RAND is to mitigate holdup and that the R in RAND stands for the level of royalty resulting from competition in advance of standard selection (pp. 5-6). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
State, supra.Walker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:54 am
Senator Rand Paul was one of the biggest proponents of this theory. [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:00 am
Smith, Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm
Today, the 1st District Court of Appeal issued its unanimous decision in Ogilvie v. [read post]
