Search for: "Rankin v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
For example, it has been held that late attendance for a school “session” may count as non-attendance (Hinchley v Rankin [1961] 1 WLR 421) and that the fact that a child had run away from home to live with her boyfriend, without informing her mother where she was, did not provide the mother with a defence (Bath and North East Somerset DC v Warman [1999] ELR 81). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
In Fredericks v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
The high court ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider these cases in light of Swarthout v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:31 am
See State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Minn. 2010).The same thing happened in Rankin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm
(As the arguments in Union of India v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm
In Rankin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
The Lord Chief Justice, also drawing on Lord Woolf MR’s comments in Heil v Rankin [2000] EWCA Civ 84, concluded that “this court has not merely the power, but a positive duty, to monitor, and where appropriate to alter, the guideline rates for general damages in personal injury actions“. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Coverage of the Court’s decision in Schuette v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:23 am
Citing the CCA case of Rankin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Supp.2d 328, 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (preemption because plaintiffs “have not pointed to evidence of device-specific violations of federal law”); Rankin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:06 am
This week our lawsuit, Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:24 am
” Rankin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
Jeannette Rankin Jeannette Rankin / Portrait, bust, facing left. c1916 Aug. 1. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Where its employee speaks on matters of public concern, the government bears the burden of justifying any adverse employment action [Rankin v McPherson, 483 US 378].It was undisputed that many federal and state laws require ACS and HRA records, reports, and information relating to specific children or families, be kept confidential. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
People of State of New York v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:16 am
Citing Rankin v McPherson, 483 US 378, the Circuit Court said that "[a]lthough it is well-established that an employer may not discharge a public employee in retaliation for the employee's exercise of his right to freedom of speech, that right is not absolute. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 9:11 pm
Rankin were neighbors. [read post]
