Search for: "Rantanen"
Results 121 - 140
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 10:40 am
By Jason Rantanen Alan J. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
My August article referenced a Patently-O article by Professor Rantanen that included an analysis of the Federal Circuit’s Apple v Samsung decision and its ramifications, suggesting that the section 289 damages provision could induce “an explosion of design patent assertions and lawsuits. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:06 pm
Rantanen, Jason, Empirical Analyses of Judicial Opinions: Methodology, Metrics and the Federal Circuit (May 3, 2016). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:38 am
By Jason Rantanen We’re now halfway through financial year 2016, and so far patent application and grant numbers are looking similar to the past few years. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:01 am
By Jason Rantanen In preparing for a talk on recent developments in patent law that I’m giving in a few days at the Salishan Patent Conference, I went back and reread Judge Dyk’s opinion concurring in the Federal Circuit’s denial of rehearing en banc in Sequenom v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:11 pm
By Jason Rantanen Mag Aerospace Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
Impression Products Samuel Ernst, Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta Jason Rantanen, En banc Federal Circuit affirms Mallinkrodt, notwithstanding Quanta Dennis Crouch, Lexmark and Disposability: Gumming Up the Market for Refills and Repairs Dennis Crouch, Lexmark v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
By Jason Rantanen This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the design patent remedies question in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:24 pm
Cir. 2016) Professor Rantanen wrote about the 2013 Federal Circuit OWW v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:53 am
Rantanen explained, although the holding is simple, the ten-member majority panel took 90+ pages to describe how its conclusions conform with 19th – 21st century Supreme Court precedent and why the patent laws should operate differently than the copyright regime in these cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
By Jason Rantanen Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Texas A&M), Arti Rai (Duke) and Jay Kesan (Illinois) recently released a draft of their empirical study of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:37 pm
By Jason Rantanen Wi-Lan, Inc v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m excited to report that my academic institution, the University of Iowa, is hiring an in-house intellectual property attorney. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
Rantanen and Chris Seaman Professors Rantanen and Seaman take a statutory and historical approach in their argument that willfulness is the appropriate standard for determining whether damages should be enhanced. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:42 pm
By Jason Rantanen Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit released a set of proposed amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Procedure that completely overhaul the existing rules. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:15 pm
The brief cites to Patently-O essays by Gary Griswold and Jason Rantanen (predicting an “explosion of design patent assertions and lawsuits”). = = = = = [1] U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:54 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m very much looking forward to giving the Patent Year-in-Review talk at the AIPLA annual meeting tomorrow. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:29 pm
By Jason Rantanen The USPTO recently released the data on the number of patent applications filed in Fiscal Year 2015 via its Data Visualization Center (i.e.: the Dashboard) page. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
” In his essay on the decision, Jason Rantanen wrote that these holdings are “probably erroneous—doctrinal developments. [read post]
