Search for: "Rashid v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 2:07 am
Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Syed Tahla Ahsan and Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v United Kingdom – 24027/07 [2010] ECHR 1067 (6 July 2010) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has delayed the extradition of four men, including the notorious Mustafa Kamal Mustafa (Abu Hamza), from the United Kingdom to the United States due to concerns that long prison sentences and harsh conditions in a “supermax”… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
” In any case, the petitioner points to the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:01 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Zafar & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 184 (13 February 2008) K v R [2008] EWCA Crim 185 (13 February 2008) JT v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 183 (12 February 2008) Kelly, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 137 (08 February 2008) AS, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 138 (08 February 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Hansford v Southampton Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 67 (Admin) (19 February 2008) Rashid, R (on the… [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 11:44 am
Simpson a statistic and not given him room to mature to the point where he could become a United States senator. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm
The United States’s Doreen Bogdan-Martin will face Russia’s Rashid Ismailov in a vote that occurred Sept. 29. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
The National Journal asked foreign policy experts what the United States should do to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention to further demonstrate that the United States, in detaining the petitioner indefinitely, violates international law. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am
The question is whether the United States is politically and militarily prepared to dig in for a 10- or 20-year campaign. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
United KingdomHis Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Makhtoum v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
