Search for: "Rasul v. Bush" Results 141 - 160 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
Bush and Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
"Given the lengthy debates and disagreements among Members of Congress as to the handling of these detainees, and the perception that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit failed to follow this Court's direction in Rasul v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
" In the Al Odah petition, attorneys contended that the Supreme Court's decision in Rasul v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
That question, however, was already answered by Rasul v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Baher Azmy (Seton Hall University - School of Law) has posted Rasul v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
But in order to distinguish the SCOTUS' Rasul decision in the recent Gitmo habeas case, the Bush Administration has disavowed implicitly the unitary executive theory. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
Bush, and (ii) that this elimination of habeas was not unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, What the Bush Veto Means (July 19, 2006)37. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:50 pm
They also suggested that Robertson had misinterpreted the Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 7:31 pm
Here's an interesting media account of a forthcoming paper by Seton Hall lawprof Mark Denbeaux (and his son Joshua) about the actual content of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals that were convened after the Supreme Court's decision in Rasul v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
Bush, which after all started the whole debate by opening the federal courts to habeas petitions from alien detainees. [read post]