Search for: "Raymond Murray" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
‘Culture in all its early uses was a noun of process,’ Raymond Williams says in Keywords.It described ‘the tending of something, basically crops or animals. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:43 pm
Hutchins, III, and Army RANGER, Staff Sergeant Raymond L. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
In Travis v Murray, the court, in the context of a divorce action, was called upon to decide with whom Joey, a miniature dachshund, should live. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:41 pm
SMITH RD 7/11/2005 BULLOCH 6850 CYPRESS LAKE RD 11/3/2004 BURKE WAYNESBORO 2223 HWY 56 1/15/2006 BURKE WAYNESBORO 3696 HIGHWAY 25 Apt B 7/14/2006 BURKE WAYNESBORO 383 WINTER RD 7/14/2006 … [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:34 am by Emma Snell
Annie Grayer, Jamie Gangel, Zachary Cohen, Gloria Borger and Sara Murray report for CNN. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
News & Analysis 10121-10125 (2011).ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.Dake, Raymond. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich has successfully passed the first stage of his libel claim against journalist Catherine Belton and publisher HarperCollins for allegations made in the best-selling book, Putin’s People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took On The West (Abramovich v HarperCollins and Catherine Belton [2021] EWHC 3154 (QB)). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It was also signed by Bob and Sally Dowler, Peter Wilmshurst, Robert Murat, Mary-Ann Field, Zoe Margolis, Nigel Short, Hardeep Singh, Peter Murray, Parameswaran Subramanyam, and Peter Duffy. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not grant an interim injunction… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Laura Murray, Queen's University Balance, clarity, fair dealing, anti-circumvention with link to copyright infringement. [read post]