Search for: "Rayner v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
This was prompted by the 5000+ complaints over the misogynistic coverage of Angela Rayner MP which appeared in the Mail on Sunday last weekend. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am
….(5)If the justices are of opinion that an application under this section is frivolous, they may refuse to state a case, and, if the applicant so requires, shall give him a certificate stating that the application has been refused; but the justices shall not refuse to state a case if the application is made by or under the direction of the Attorney General. (6)Where justices refuse to state a case, the High Court may, on the application of the person who… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was not… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
On 30 October, Nicklin J handed down judgment in Rayner v Seabourne-Hawkins [2020] EWHC 2895 (QB). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
HHJ Lewis noted the Court’s discretion to award a single award in the case or two or more libels, as stated in Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers [2017] EWHC 543 (QB). [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:25 pm
Contents include:ArticlesMichael Douglas & Nicholas Loadsman, The Impact of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial ContractsAndrew Edgar & Rayner Thwaites, Implementing Treaties in Domestic Law: Translation, Enforcement and Administrative Law Gabrielle Holly, Transnational Tort and Access to Remedy under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Kamasee v Commonwealth David Hughes, Investigation as Legitimisation: The Development,… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
See Southeastern Promotions v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:07 am
Lopez East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:07 am
Lopez East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
Related Blog Posts East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
Related Blog Posts East Texas Appeals Court Affirms $2.6 Million Verdict in Accident Allegedly Caused by Fatigued Trucker – Rayner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:48 pm
The Facts of the Case In the case of Rayner v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
(See, Rayner vs. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
– Marcus Rayner, executive director of the New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Alliance, issued the following statement regarding the state Supreme Court’s decision in Kendall v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
