Search for: "Re v. Magness Construction Co." Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  If so, you’re already one up on Arters. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
Supp.2d 791, 822-23 (D.S.C. 2011) (including “constructive” fraud); Grinage v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:41 am by Chris Jaglowitz
- Habitat Mag - http://bit.ly/p6m4NL > Perhaps the dumbest question ever. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included:   Senators Specter and Leahy express concern about ACTA Treaty (Techdirt) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Justice) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) Commerce Department cites questionable stats, Chamber of Commerce uses them to ask Bush to sign PRO IP Bill into law (Techdirt) (Techdirt) (Public… [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§1320d-2; In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 493, 497 n.11 (N.J. [read post]