Search for: "Re v. PERS" Results 61 - 80 of 7,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:33 am by Unknown
That order perhaps gives the SEC some temporary relief but under the applicable rules, the Eighth Circuit will have an opportunity to decide whether to re-instate the stay of the regulation (Liberty Energy Incorporated v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm by Alexandre Lodie
The Court seems to qualify TCF String as personal data per se, without further consideration as to whether IAB Europe is, in practice, able to re-identify data. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
There were 2,934 responses: 51 per cent were in favour of removing the Bishop’s vote and 49 per cent in favour of retaining it. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 10:48 am by Wiggam Law
Willful penalties can still be assessed per account per year. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
We knew exactly how many pages per day we could scan, how much it would cost and what dials we could turn to alter cost or throughput if needed. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am by Richard A. Morehouse
The recipe for residential apartment success in Cleveland’s central business district has seen significant changes, primarily because a substantial portion of its traditional demand base—those employed in downtown Cleveland’s office buildings—has yet to return. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]