Search for: "Re v. PERS" Results 81 - 100 of 7,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am by Trane Robinson
OSHA, 595 U.S. 109, 117, 118 (2022) (per curiam) (twice quoting In re MCP No. 165, 20 F. 4th 264, 272, 274 (6th Cir. 2021) (Sutton, C.J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc)). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm by Dylan Gibbs
With just under 7% of positions sitting empty, we’re no longer in uncharted territory. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am by Stephanie Ellis
Unfortunately, denial of an 8(a) applicant because of a lack of potential for success is not a denial reason that can be appealed per 13 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  Perhaps, then, those arguments will be re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship from whence they came. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
  But who can forget former Justice Scheinkman’s decision In re Piekos (discussed here), which [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm by Amy Howe
The question before the court in Garland v. [read post]