Search for: "Rea v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 655
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-7909 (whether an offense with a mens rea of recklessness triggers a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause), and Dykes v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Categories of Unprotected Speech The Minnesota law at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
” Mens Rea. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:37 am
United States, decided on February 26. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am
United States some thirty-four years, or more than eleven law school generations, ago — the Court (and all parties) agreed that Section 2 liability has two components: an act, and mens rea. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
United States and Ratzlaf v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Teresa Stanek Rea was Acting Director from February 1, 2013, and Michelle Lee is now a Deputy Director. ____ Q: Who was issued U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Similarly, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
United States, ___ A.3d ___ (2013), a recent case dealing with the required mental state for unlawful entry. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
Licci v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
This will allow plaintiffs to argue that their claims somehow “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with sufficient force to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality announced in Kiobel. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
Touby cited and distinguished an earlier case—United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
On December 19, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of Doe I v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has decided Kansas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm
This is related, I think, to a passage in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
” Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
United States, and it involves a question that comes up frequently in federal criminal cases. [read post]
