Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration" Results 101 - 120 of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2023, 8:04 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Must “Be Receiving Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits to Continue to Receive LTD Benefits Beyond 24 Months To qualify for the Plan’s LTD benefits for more than 24 months, Robinson needed to “be receiving” Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) from the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) by the end of the initial 24 months of LTD payments. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While both have set a tone to protect investors in the context of ESG investing, the Biden administration underscores that the protection should derive from the accuracy and fulsomeness of risk disclosures, while discounting purported distinctions between profitability and social value. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
Defending the MPP, the Department of Homeland Security argued for a narrower reading of the expedited removal provisions in the INA. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:27 am by John Parker
Recent developments in the challenge to an executive order from the Biden Administration in Louisiana v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by P.J. Blount
– Homeland Security Watch Lawmakers Take Closer Look at DHS’ Social Media Monitoring – Communia Anonymous Promises Regularly Scheduled Friday Attacks – Threat Level The Regulatory Provisions of the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 – Lawfare [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm by Susan McLean
Put in place practical security measures for employees who have been approved to administrate/operate blogs and social media pages. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am by Patti Spencer
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
  That case is looking at whether administrative law judges deciding cases under the Social Security Act should have been appointed by the President Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the SSA forfeits an appointments-clause challenge to the appointment of an administrative law judge by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]