Search for: "Reader v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
So what do the readers think about the dichotomy distinctiveness-functional descriptiveness for advertising purposes? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
However, Hill went beyond Dumas and, even assuming that a lost chance claim could exist generally, refused to apply it to product liability cases:[T]he lost chance doctrine, even when recognized, has been limited to medical malpractice cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Encino Motors, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See generally Sinclair v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
As a result, the ruling supports the view that plaintiffs cannot simply “forum shop” in large class actions, and instead must sue where the corporate defendant has significant contacts for purposes of general jurisdiction or limit the class definition to residents of the state where the lawsuit is filed. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
Acamar Partners Acquisition Corporation is a SPAC that completed its IPO in February 2019. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:13 am
Tessier v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:15 am
Take for example the shareholder proposal submitted earlier this year to General Motors. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
At the same time, they are also providing news media producers with access to readers. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:47 am
To be sure, the hearing on Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Regular readers (clickers?) [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:23 pm
[vi] Rico v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
In Tesla Motors Ltd v British Broadcasting Corporation [2011] EWHC 2760 (QB), Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 715, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (corporate motive testimony excluded); New Mexico Savings & Loan Ass'n v. [read post]
