Search for: "Reagan v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Such an interpretation, the government adds, would have meant that actions taken by Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan during diplomatic crises – Carter denied visas to citizens of Iran, while Reagan barred Cuban citizens from immigrating to the United States – would also have been illegal. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:15 am by alysondrake
Image via Wikipedia.Michelle Obama-First African American First Lady of the United States-“One of the lessons that I grew up with was to always stay true to yourself and never let what somebody else says distract you from your goals. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am by Ilya Somin
 (NA)  Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Then, beginning in the Reagan Administration, Congress continued to add further classes of Medicaid beneficiaries, eventually covering all pregnant women, children age five and under with family incomes below 133% of the federal poverty line, and children between the ages of six and 18 with family incomes below the federal poverty level.At each stage of expansion, Congress required that States include these new groups as [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 361 U.S. 416, 423-24 (1960), overruled on other grounds by Burks v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
United States as if it put to rest the serious First Amendment concerns prepublication review raises. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
  The statute says that state law is preempted when a crash occurs "on the high seas beyond three nautical miles from the shore of the United States. [read post]