Search for: "Ream v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
In light of the foregoing Federal and state statutes and regulations, it is clear that Hammond did not jeopardize her own eligibility for Medicaid by transferring her monthly income into the SNT for the benefit of her son, who was both disabled and under 65 years of age (see Reames v State of Oklahoma, 411 F3d at 1164; Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, 23 Probate & Property at 16). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
