Search for: "Reapportionment Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 6:25 pm by Record on Appeal
In a case we blogged about here, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued its decision today in the consolidated reapportionment cases Malama Solomon et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:17 am by Record on Appeal
In the reapportionment cases, which we originally blogged about here (Malama Solomon et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
There is little chance that the Administration will win this case. [read post]
., we'll be live blogging the Hawaii Supreme Court oral arguments in the Big Island reapportionment cases, Solomon v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:16 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
., we'll be live blogging the Hawaii Supreme Court oral arguments in the Big Island reapportionment cases, Solomon v. [read post]
*A procedural note: the Respondents in the two cases were the Reapportionment Commission and Governor Abercrombie, respectively. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The week before last, the Hawaii Supreme Court unanimously invalidated the Reapportionment Commission's redistricting plan because the Commission included non-residents in the population base, and the Hawaii Constitution requires use of "the total number of permanent residents in each of the basic island units and computed by the method known as the method of equal proportions. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 2:40 pm by Georgialee Lang
  Earlier appeal cases confirm that the “threshold for departing from equal division of property is high”. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:53 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Speeds Case on Excluding Undocumented Immigrants in Redistricting; A lower court had ruled that the Trump administration’s plan to alter the census count for congressional reapportionment violated federal law”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report on an order that the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Amy Howe
A 2019 Supreme Court ruling in an earlier census case prevented the Trump administration from including a citizenship question on the census, and so any attempt to exclude unauthorized immigrants from the reapportionment calculation would be based largely on non-census data. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
The Court forged ahead over Justice Frankfurter’s objections, notwithstanding his fears that state legislatures or Congress might not comply with federal court orders to reapportion.In responding to reapportionment cases, the Court proceeded in stages. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 5:44 am by amy.burchfield@law.csuohio.edu
This Friday November 4th, Case Law presents its Law Review Symposium, “Baker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that federal courts had the power to rule on the constitutionality of reapportionment plans and decisions (that is, changes in the boundaries of voting districts) made by state governments. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, University of Illinois Chicago Law School The Supreme Court ruled today that the case challenging President Trump's plan to report reapportionment numbers to Congress without accounting for unauthorized aliens was not ripe for judicial review and that... [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:53 am by Rick Hasen
The President, through amicus curiae briefs filed by the Solicitor General, supported the result in Baker, and influenced the doctrinal development of subsequent reapportionment cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:34 am by Kent Scheidegger
I wonder why congressmen give such priority to reapportionment cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 10:23 am by Laura Orr
If you want to read the April 9, 2021, Oregon Supreme Court case on how the Legislative Assembly and the Secretary of State will meet deadlines for decennial reapportionment of state legislative districts set out in Article IV, section 6, of the Oregon Constitution, given the federal government will not meet its own statutory deadline to produce federal decennial census data: Short case name: Advance Sheet*: State ex rel Kotek v. [read post]