Search for: "Reason v. Lewis" Results 1 - 20 of 2,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2008, 8:26 am
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 246 “Where, in relation to a question whether user of land had been user as of right, the issue of deference arose as between a landowner and other people making use of the land, the question was how the position would have appeared to the landowner, rather than to the other users, and what would matter to the landowner would be the fact of deference, not the reasons for it. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Regina (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (No 2) [2010] UKSC 11; [2010] WLR (D) 59 “The tripartite test of nec vi, nec clam, nec precario (not by force, nor stealth, nor the licence of the owner) was sufficient to establish that land which had been used by local inhabitants for lawful sports and pastimes for 20 years had been used ‘as of right’ so that they were entitled to have the land registered as a town or village green under s 15 of the Commons… [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
  In a judgment handed down today (Lewis v Commissioner of Police (No.2) [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB))  Tugendhat J rejected the claimant’s application for trial by judge and jury which was made on Monday 21 May 2012. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:14 am by MBettman
On April 22, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio unanimously dismissed as improvidently certified SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 25, 2017, Lewis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Powell’s reasons for defending diversity are worth recovering today, not least because courts continue to misinterpret his landmark opinion in Regents v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm by Susan N. Herman
He was across the street at the Supreme Court, watching the oral argument in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:44 am
The Court of Appeals reversed, and held that the court erred in denying Lewis's motion because the police did not have an articulable reasonable suspicion to stop Lewis based upon the fact that he "almost" hit the car.In dissent, Judge Rodowsky found the evidence sufficient to support the traffic stop, because the misdemeanor of negligent driving was committed in the presence of the police officers.The majority and dissenting opinions are available in PDF… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm by almaraz
Lewis & Clark Law Review Spring Symposium Who is the Reasonable Person? [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
The 9th reasoned that the defendant could have asked for appointed counsel.U.S. v. [read post]