Search for: "Record v. Metropolitan Transit Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
Gary claims that Ivey Epps and her mother were "victims of negligent inspection" by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
District Court held than an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority could, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act [29 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Time Warner Cable Inc.Docket: 11-1236Issue(s): (1) Whether the statute governing Texas’s transition from municipal-level to state-level cable franchising is subject to strict scrutiny under the Speech and Press Clauses of the First Amendment; and (2) whether a federal court of appeals can hold unconstitutional a state statute that has been amended during the pendency of the appeal, without first allowing the state to make a record in defense of the amended statute.Certiorari… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Tulisa used a YouTube video, which has now attracted over 3.5 million views, to “set the record straight” following the leak and publication of a private video. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985), or whether Garcia‘s approach has been overtaken by subsequent cases in which this Court has explicitly recognized judicially enforceable limits on Congress‘s power to interfere with state sovereignty; and (3) whether the Affordable Care Act‘s mandate that virtually every individual obtain health insurance exceeds Congress‘s enumerated powers and, if so, to what extent (if any) the mandate can… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps International House of Pancakes – IHOP files trademark infringement suit against International House of Prayer (IPKat) Metropolitan Transit Authority – Taking the IP train: MTA asserts trademark rights in iconography, including alphanumeric train symbols (Likelihood of Confusion) Sorrentino, Michael and Polizzi, Nicole – USPTO rejects trademark applications for reality TV series actors’ nicknames… [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]