Search for: "Redding v. Christian"
Results 1 - 20
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2011, 7:48 am
Christian Louboutin tried to distinguish its shoes from others by giving them a shiny red lacquered sole. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
The popular Christian Louboutin (CL) shoes’ red sole trademark is readily recognized by the consuming public. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:59 am
Christian Louboutin's Distinctive Red OutersolesIn Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Christian Louboutin’s red-soled shoes have been seen everywhere- from red carpets to local events. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
Those in the Louboutin camp disagree with YSL’s notion that Christian Louboutin has used his trademark as back-door way of monopolizing the market on red shoes. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
California - The Second Circuit on Wednesday ruled that French high fashion shoemaker Christian Louboutin is entitled to trademark protection for the iconic red soles on its shoes, dealing a blow to competing fashion house Yves Saint Laurent in its bid to outfox Louboutin's infringement claims. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was said, in the important ruling in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent 29-30- that:‘We conclude, based on the record before us, that Louboutin has not established secondary meaning in an application of a red sole to a red shoe, but only where the red sole contrasts with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Stella v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
The matter concerned a trademark registration (TM 0874489) in Benelux for a red colored sole on a women's high-heeled shoe by Christian Louboutin. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
The matter concerned a trademark registration (TM 0874489) in Benelux for a red colored sole on a women's high-heeled shoe by Christian Louboutin. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
The case cite is Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 8:24 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Knowledge On the evening of August 1, 2018, Christian Guerreiro and Ryan Eades were driving a red 1991 Mazda Miata over the Woodrow Wilson Bridge on their way from Virginia to Maryland. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in its August 10, 2011 decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
