Search for: "Redding v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
The full media release can be accessed here. 4 ASIC publishes new article on greenwashing On 7 November 2023, ASIC reiterated that greenwashing remains an enforcement priority in its new article, Red light for greenwashing. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:11 pm
(As much as I respect Justice Scalia's vote in Texas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
Recently, in Segway v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
That a lawyer proceeded pro se is a red flag, as with anyone else. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
Case Citation: Roland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:05 pm
From the Complaint filed today in Armenta v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Engel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 8:43 am
” Red Cat Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
If the evaluation of “whether disqualification should be imposed on any individual” are “[l]eft to local administration, with limited fact-finding by a single judge or state official,” he wrote, “the risk is that Trump’s exclusion in [one state] will beget a political tit-for-tat in which Biden is in turn excluded in a red state, or candidates of either party are pulled from the ballot in future. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
