Search for: "Redmond v Bailey"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
Clorox chose not to sue Bailey for obvious reasons - the PepsiCo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
Although “unfounded” allegations are not actionable under Judiciary Law § 487, deliberate misrepresentations are (see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 11-15 [2009]; Ticketmaster Corp. v Lidsky, 245 AD2d 142, 143 [1st Dept 1997]; Redmond v Bailey, 2012 NY Slip Op 31081[U], *6 [Sup Ct, Queens County 2012]). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:56 am
Although “unfounded” allegations are not actionable under Judiciary Law § 487, deliberate misrepresentations are (see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 11-15 [2009]; Ticketmaster Corp. v Lidsky, 245 AD2d 142, 143 [1st Dept 1997]; Redmond v Bailey, 2012 NY Slip Op 31081[U], *6 [Sup Ct, Queens County 2012]). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:15 am
” Redmond v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Box 22501 Eugene, OR 97402 Phone: (541) 689-7242 (V/TTY) Fax: (541) 461-8601 E-mail: kswezey@efn.org Web: http://www.shhhor.org Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Access Program Orego [read post]
