Search for: "Reed v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am by William A. Ruskin
Seth Jaffee, a lawyer following these issues at Foley Hoag in Boston, reported on both the New Mexico case and a case in federal district court in the District of Columbia before the Hon. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  Writing for the National Review Online’s Bench Memos blog, Clark Neily – who served as co-counsel to the plaintiffs in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
District of Columbia and the chances of review by the Supreme Court; Dan Filler has these thoughts at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
  In New York Magazine, John Heilemann makes the case for the appointment of Judge Merrick Garland of the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
A:link { color: 993333; text-decoration: none; } A:visited { color: 993333; text-decoration: none; } A:active { color: blue; text-decoration: none; } A:hover { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; } Vol. 122 · November 2008 · No. 1 THE SUPREME COURT, 2007 TERM     FOREWORD: DEMOSPRUDENCE THROUGH DISSENT Lani Guinier COMMENTS: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, in two cases concerning Congress’s Article III standing to sue over alleged executive branch illegality: Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s method of analyzing Second Amendment issues – a three-part test that asks whether (1) a regulation bans weapons that were common at the time of ratification or (2) those that have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia and (3) whether law-abiding citizens retain adequate means of self-defense – is consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in District of Columbia… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
  Sentencing Law and Policy’s Douglas Berman suggests that as a former prosecutor, Justice Alito “may be more attentive than some other Justices to the potential echoes of [District of Columbia v. [read post]
EEOC, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the EEOC had failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its 30 percent incentive limit, and as a result, the EEOC removed the incentive sections from the ADA and GINA regulations. [read post]