Search for: "Reed v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm by Gene Killian
” Citing a Federal Court decision from Georgia also involving BancInsure, the Court wrote: “The [Georgia] court noted that the ‘insured v. insured’ exclusion and the regulatory exclusion overlap when a regulatory agency brings an action as a receiver, but that removing the regulatory exclusion did not affect the application of the ‘insured v. insured’ exclusion. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm by Gordon Firemark
Ninth Circuit Eliminates Presumption of Irreparable Harm for Trademark Owners Seeking a Preliminary Injunction Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Finally, In an August 21, 2012 opinion, Central District of California Judge James V. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Dallas lawyer Jamie Ribman of Looper Reed & McGraw on the firm’s blog, Tilting the Scales Email Killing You? [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  It was more likely that consumers were purchasing the paintings because of their allegiance to the team, not because the paintings were thought to be originated or affiliated with the University of Alabama (dare the AmeriKat cite Arsenal v Reed's "badge of allegiance" argument?) [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit noted that the carrier’s reliance on the Georgia Supreme Court’s holding in Reed v. [read post]