Search for: "Reed v. High" Results 141 - 160 of 660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
It may be that (as Lord Carnwath appeared to have in mind in declining to enter a dissenting note on the application of this test, despite having reservations as to its correctness: [41]) a high premium has been placed on certainty in the construction of s 3(2). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the employee’s retaliation claims under the False Claims Act (FCA) and state whistleblower law that she was retaliated against for refusing to engage in unlawful activity were dismissed because she did not identify the law or regulation that would have been violated (Reed v. [read post]
The first is the helpful summary in Lord Reed’s judgment of the correct approach to interpretation under the HRA. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Hubanks] Sign laws face tough scrutiny under 2015’s Reed v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:05 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On June 26, the UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Abela and others (Appellants) v Baadarani (Respondent) The Court issued the following press summary. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
Julie Taboh of Voice of America reports on the fortieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:34 am by Nick Austin and Mike Adamson
Public today: an important judgment handed down by the English High Court this morning has re-opened the door to recovering damages in addition to demurrage for losses caused by exceeding laytime in cargo operations. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Jay Willis
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Attorney-client privilege defeats motion to depose attorneyClark v Schuylerville Cent. [read post]