Search for: "Reed v. Mai" Results 21 - 40 of 2,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
(For those curious, Parts V and VI of our ten-part series are mostly done, though they may change depending on what happens in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  The privilege of membership in a party may be, as this Court said in Grovey v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
The Petitioners were given until 16 May 2023 to file any reply that they wish to those objections. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm by Steven Calabresi
 But, if you want to know what Democrats think about this, and what they will do on January 6, 2025, take the time to read Yale Sterling Professor of Law Akhil Reed Amar's amicus brief, co-written with his brother Vikram, in Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am by David Pocklington
But what is of relevance is the reliance that the Deputy Chancellor placed (at paragraph 9) upon observations from the judgment of Lord Reed, in the Supreme Court, in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51 (at paragraph 92) drawing a distinction between ‘the mere busybody and the person affected by or having a reasonable concern in the matter to which the application relates’. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
Reed Freeman Jr. , a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of ArentFox Schiff LLP, may be contacted at reed.freeman@afslaw.com . [read post]